From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FT Glob. Capital v. Future Fintech Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 17, 2024
8:24-mc-00014-JWH-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-mc-00014-JWH-KES

07-17-2024

FT Global Capital, Inc. v. Future Fintech Group, Inc.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) WHY APPLICATION OF NONRESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Dkt. 7) SHOULD NOT BE DENIED UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-2.1.3.2(c).

This Court orders Defendant Future Fintech Group, Inc. to show cause why Matthew M. Wawrzyn's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice should not be denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c).

On July 16, 2024, this attorney applied for permission to appear pro hac vice. (Dkt. 7.)

Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c) states:

Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or Acts of Congress, an applicant is not eligible for permission to practice pro hac vice if the applicant ... is regularly engaged in business, profession, or other similar activities in California.

In 2018, Judge Anderson, of this district, concluded that L.R. 83-2.1.3.2(c) prohibited an attorney-who had appeared pro hac vice five times in this district within the previous three years-from appearing pro hac vice. Kerstein v. Antelope Valley Hosp., No. 18-08960-PA-JPR, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231347 at *2, 2018 WL 10111360 at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2018). Judge Anderson did so because he concluded that those prior appearances constituted being “regularly engaged in business, profession, or other similar activities in California.” Id.

This court's research indicates that, within the last three years, Mr. Wawrzyn has appeared pro hac vice in at least the following six California cases:

• Central District: 2:20-cv-04134-AB-AFM,
• Northern District: 3:20-cv-02473-EMC,
• Northern District: 5:20-cv-07273-EJD,
• Northern District: 5:21-cv-04649-BLF,
• Northern District: 5:22-cv-001122-PCP, and
• Southern District: 3:20-cv-01350-JO-MDD

For these reasons, Defendant is ORDERED, on or before July 24, 2024, to show cause in writing why Matthew M. Wawrzyn is not “regularly engaged in business, profession, or other similar activities in California” and should not have his Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). Any response to this OSC shall identify all Mr. Wawrzyn's appearances in California state court in the last three years and any other California federal court appearances in the last three years that this Court has not found.


Summaries of

FT Glob. Capital v. Future Fintech Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 17, 2024
8:24-mc-00014-JWH-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)
Case details for

FT Glob. Capital v. Future Fintech Grp.

Case Details

Full title:FT Global Capital, Inc. v. Future Fintech Group, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 17, 2024

Citations

8:24-mc-00014-JWH-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)