Summary
construing a pro se habeas petition liberally and remanding to the district court with instructions to allow leave to amend petition in the interests of justice
Summary of this case from Cardenas v. Nevada Attorney Gen.Opinion
No. 72-2433.
July 12, 1972.
Moses Bruno Fryer, pro se.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Moses Bruno Fryer has applied to this Court for a certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis from the district court's denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus. Because of the confused state of the record in this case, we are unable to make an informed decision on Fryer's application. Accordingly, we grant certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and summarily vacate the district court's judgment, remanding the cause for further proceedings.
28 U.S.C. § 2253; Rule 22(b), F.R.A.P.
28 U.S.C. § 1915.
The applicant who is a prisoner of the State of Georgia, has three times filed petitions for federal habeas relief in the district court. The first was dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies; the second was dismissed on the merits, without calling for a response or conducting a hearing. The third habeas petition was also summarily denied.
In each of these petitions, the applicant has attempted to relate the facts upon which he bases his contentions that his conviction for burglary is invalid. His pleadings, however, appear unintelligible. Liberally construing Fryer's prose habeas petitions we find his pleadings, though rather incoherent, do indicate that he may be entitled to relief. Because he appears unable to articulate his contentions in an understandable manner, we believe that justice requires that the cause be remanded to the district court with instructions to allow the applicant leave to amend his petition with the aid of appointed counsel. See Montgomery v. Caldwell, 5th Cir. 1972, 457 F.2d 767.
Therefore, the applicant's motions for certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment denying habeas corpus relief is vacated, and the cause remanded.
In view of this Court's summary action, Fryer's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is denied.