Summary
dismissing claims under FDCPA for multiple reasons, including but not limited to the fact that the plaintiff failed to clearly identify what actions taken by the defendant violated the FDCPA or what provisions were violated
Summary of this case from Carpenter v. Springleaf Consumer Loan, Inc.Opinion
NO. 1:11-CV-00606
04-03-2012
JOHN W. FRYER, Plaintiff, v. CITIFINANCIAL, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's February 23, 2012, Report and Recommendation (doc. 27). In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (docs. 13 & 20) be granted, that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice, and that this matter be closed (doc. 27).
Proper Notice was given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS and AFFIRMS it in all respects (doc. 27), GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (docs. 13 & 20), DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's complaint, and CLOSES this matter.
SO ORDERED.
S. Arthur Spiegel
United States Senior District Judge