Opinion
No. 68171
07-21-2015
DAVID M. FROSTICK, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ELISSA F. CADISH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original, pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner David M. Frostick alleges that a conflict of interest exists between him and his former counsel and that the district court failed to hold an inquiry into this conflict of interest. Frostick asks this court to dismiss all charges against him with prejudice or to order that a federal public defender be appointed to his case and/or complete a change of venue in his case. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge
David M. Frostick
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk