From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Obama

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 14, 2023
4:20-cv-00605-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)

Opinion

4:20-cv-00605-YGR

07-14-2023

VINTON FROST, Plaintiff, v. BARACK OBAMA, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, United States District Court Judge

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 25.) As explained in this Court's June 30, 2023 order denying leave to amend, plaintiff has not pled a valid claim and has shown no likelihood of being able to do so. This case is closed. Further, this Court cannot grant a preliminary injunction where plaintiff has not pled a valid claim. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131-33 (9th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, the motion is Denied.

The Court has reviewed the instant motion and has determined it appropriate for decision without oral argument, as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. See Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991).

The clerk shall not accept any further filings in this action.

This order terminates docket number 25.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Frost v. Obama

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 14, 2023
4:20-cv-00605-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Frost v. Obama

Case Details

Full title:VINTON FROST, Plaintiff, v. BARACK OBAMA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2023

Citations

4:20-cv-00605-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2023)