From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. NYC MTA

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 4, 2021
20-CV-11044 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-11044 (CM)

01-04-2021

YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, v. NYC MTA; CITY OF NY HRA; U.S. TRINIDAD EMBASSY; COURT OF APPEALS; U.S. S.D. COURT; NYC ANTI SOCIAL CLUB; A. CUOMO; NYPD; 120 WEST 72nd; TRINIDAD U.S. CONSULATE; TRINIDAD GOVERNMENT; SUPREME COURT; CVR ASSOCIATES INC.; NYCT, Defendants.


ORDER

COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge.

The Court denies Plaintiff leave to file this action because she fails to show that her claims are not frivolous. See Frost v. NYPD, ECF 1:20-CV-0417, 5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2020) (requiring Plaintiff to submit with any new complaint: a motion for leave to file; a copy of the February 14, 2020 order; the relevant fees or IFP application; and a statement, made under penalty of perjury, stating that the claims are not frivolous or in bad faith, that the lawsuit is not brought for any improper purpose, such as to harass or cause unnecessary delay, and that the filing complies with this Court's orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Court's Local Rules).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate any pending motions and close this action. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of Court documents. (ECF No. 4.).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frost v. NYC MTA

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 4, 2021
20-CV-11044 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Frost v. NYC MTA

Case Details

Full title:YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, v. NYC MTA; CITY OF NY HRA; U.S. TRINIDAD…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 4, 2021

Citations

20-CV-11044 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2021)