From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 25, 2019
Civ. No. 16-2982 (FLW) (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Civ. No. 16-2982 (FLW)

03-25-2019

ALAN C. FROST SR., Petitioner, v. STEVEN JOHNSON et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner pro se, Alan C. Frost Sr. ("Petitioner"), who is presently detained at New Jersey State Prison, in Trenton, New Jersey, brought a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus before this Court. (See ECF No. 1.) At the time of filing, Petitioner paid the required five-dollar filing fee. On February 28, 2019, the Court issued an Opinion and Order denying the Petition with prejudice. (ECF Nos. 9 & 10.)

On March 18, 2019, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 11.) He concurrently filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 12.) A party seeking to pursue appeal in forma pauperis must file a proper affidavit of poverty under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). Pursuant to Local Appellate Rule 24.1(c), a prisoner seeking to appeal the denial of a habeas petition in forma pauperis must include with the affidavit of poverty "a certified statement of the prison account statement(s) (or institutional equivalent) for the 6 month period preceding the filing of the notice of appeal." L. App. R. 24.1(c).

Paragraph (c) of Local Appellate Rule 24.1 applies to "cases filed in which 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) does not apply." L. App. R. 24.1(c). The Third Circuit has held that § 1915(b) does not apply to habeas petitions or to appeals of denials of habeas petitions. Santana v. United States, 98 F.3d 752, 756 (3d Cir. 1996). --------

Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis includes an affidavit of poverty, (ECF No. 12-6), which substantially complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1); Fed. R. App. P., App'x, Form 4. Petitioner indicates, however, that he has not submitted the required six-month account statement because "prison officials have not returned that document to Petitioner with a certification." (ECF No. 12-2.) In the interests of justice, the Court will grant Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but will require him to file a certified, six-month prison-account statement with the Court within 30 days.

Accordingly, IT IS, on this 25th day of March 2019,

ORDERED that this case is REOPENED solely for the purposes of resolving the present motion; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 12), is hereby GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner shall file with the Court the certified, six-month prison-account statement required by Local Civil Rule 24.1(c) within 30 days of the entry of this Memorandum and Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall again mark this case as CLOSED: and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

/s/ Freda L. Wolfson

FREDA L. WOLFSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Frost v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 25, 2019
Civ. No. 16-2982 (FLW) (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Frost v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ALAN C. FROST SR., Petitioner, v. STEVEN JOHNSON et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 25, 2019

Citations

Civ. No. 16-2982 (FLW) (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2019)