From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Crestron Elecs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 16, 2023
22-cv-04726-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-04726-VC

05-16-2023

ANDREW FROST, Plaintiff, v. CRESTRON ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court was advised by the parties on May 12, 2023 that they reached a settlement. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated, and any pending motions are moot.

The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frost v. Crestron Elecs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 16, 2023
22-cv-04726-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Frost v. Crestron Elecs.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW FROST, Plaintiff, v. CRESTRON ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

22-cv-04726-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)