From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1948
80 N.E.2d 455 (N.Y. 1948)

Opinion

Argued April 15, 1948

Decided May 20, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, CHURCH, J.

Lester Samuels, Murray C. Spett and Abraham Shapiro for defendant and appellant.

Harold M. Harkavy and Frederick M. Garfield for defendant and respondent.

Abraham N. Levy and Milton L. Sloane for appellant and respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company, and with one bill of costs to the defendant-respondent Beacon Chemical Corporation against plaintiff and the Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1948
80 N.E.2d 455 (N.Y. 1948)
Case details for

Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALICE FRONTENAC, Appellant and Respondent, v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 20, 1948

Citations

80 N.E.2d 455 (N.Y. 1948)
80 N.E.2d 455

Citing Cases

Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Rather this is a situation where the King Kullen owed a duty of using reasonable care in the maintenance of…

Copher v. Barbee

For cases permitting such submission, see Loch v. Confair, 372 Pa. 212, 93 A.2d 451; Day v. Grand Union Co.,…