Opinion
(10247)
Argued January 10, 1992
Decision released February 4, 1992
Appeal from a decision by the defendant conservation commission of the town of East Lyme granting the named defendant's application to conduct certain regulated activities within a designated wetlands area, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New London and tried to the court, Hurley, J.; judgment dismissing the appeal, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Robert Fromer, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
Scott R. Chadwick, with whom, on the brief, was Thomas J. Riley, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).
Maryann Diaz, for the appellee (defendant conservation commission of the town of East Lyme).
If we assume, arguendo, that the plaintiff has standing, the limited issue properly before us is whether the trial court correctly found that there was no conduct that had or was reasonably likely to have the effect of unreasonably polluting, impairing or destroying the public trust in the air, water or other natural resources of the state within the meaning of General Statutes 22a-19. This presents a question of fact that the trial court correctly resolved in favor of the defendants.