From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frlekin v. Apple, Inc.

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Sep 20, 2017
S243805 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2017)

Opinion

S243805

09-20-2017

FRLEKIN (AMANDA) v. APPLE, INC.


Request for certification granted

The request for certification directed to this court from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is accepted. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.548(f)(5), the issue is rephrased as follows: Is time spent on the employer's premises waiting for, and undergoing, required exit searches of packages or bags voluntarily brought to work purely for personal convenience by employees compensable as “hours worked” within the meaning of California Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order No. 7?

For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, appellants Amanda Frlekin, Taylor Kalin, Aaron Gregoroff, Seth Dowling, and Debra Speicher are deemed the petitioners in this court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).)

Chin, J., was recused and did not participate.

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.


Summaries of

Frlekin v. Apple, Inc.

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Sep 20, 2017
S243805 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Frlekin v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRLEKIN (AMANDA) v. APPLE, INC.

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

Citations

S243805 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2017)