From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.),


Ordered that, on the Court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted ( see, CPLR 5701[c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly held that the plaintiffs could not compel nonparty witnesses to answer questions at their depositions which sought their expert opinions ( see, Cuccia v Brooklyn Med. Group, 171 A.D.2d 836; Horowitz v. Upjohn Co., 149 A.D.2d 467; Waters v. East Nassau Med. Group, 92 A.D.2d 893; Wilson v. McCarthy, 53 A.D.2d 860).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital

Case Details

Full title:CORIN FRISTROM et al., Appellants, v. PEEKSKILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

Shannon Reilly v. Ninia

The trial court correctly determined that the former director of the hospital's Department of Obstetrics and…

Sciara v. Surgical Associates of Western N.Y.

Rather, his role during the deposition is limited to the situations governed by Uniform Rules §§ 221.2 and…