From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friesch-Groningsche v. Brooke Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1995
211 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by offering proof of the existence of a mortgage and the defendant's default thereon. Thus, upon the defendant's failure to establish, by admissible evidence, that a triable issue of fact existed, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion (see, Prudential Ins. Co. v. Hamilton Plaza Co., 209 A.D.2d 498). Miller, J.P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Friesch-Groningsche v. Brooke Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1995
211 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Friesch-Groningsche v. Brooke Associates

Case Details

Full title:FRIESCH-GRONINGSCHE HYPOTHEEKBANK REALTY CREDIT CORP., Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 897