From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 4, 2011
427 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6324.

Submitted: April 28, 2011.

Decided: May 4, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:10-cv-00248-DKC).

Andrew Friedman, Appellant pro se. Rex Schultz Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Andrew Friedman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Friedman v. Warden, No. 8:10-cv-00248-DKC, 2011 WL 768842 (D.Md. Feb. 28, 2011). We deny Friedman's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 4, 2011
427 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Friedman v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:Andrew FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; John P. Galley…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

427 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2011)