From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Fortgang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1964
21 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

June 23, 1964


Order, entered on March 31, 1964, denying the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In this September, 1961 action for personal injuries incurred in July, 1959, the affidavits of merits submitted by the plaintiffs set forth in especially satisfactory detail evidentiary facts which, if true and proven, establish a strong meritorious case. In view of these affidavits Special Term's exercise of discretion in accepting the rather weak excuses for the delay should not be disturbed (see Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A.D.2d 25, 32).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Staley, JJ.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Fortgang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1964
21 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Friedman v. Fortgang

Case Details

Full title:NATALIE FRIEDMAN et al., Respondents, v. BEATRICE FORTGANG et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

De La Cruz v. Kahama Realty Inc.

"Further, the courts have held that where there is a weak excuse or no excuse at all but the plaintiff has…

Celentano v. Furci's Rest

It thus appears that the defendant, despite the telephone conversations of October 28, 1965 and with full…