From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Demato

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 14, 1991
591 A.2d 827 (Conn. App. Ct. 1991)

Opinion

(9341)

Argued April 26, 1991

Decision released May 14, 1991

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of the defendants' alleged negligence, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Danbury, where the court, Stodolink, J., rendered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff; thereafter, the court denied the defendants' motion to open the judgment and the defendants appealed to this court. Affirmed.

David S. Grossman, for the appellants (defendants). John T. Shearman, for the appellee (plaintiff).


Summaries of

Friedman v. Demato

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 14, 1991
591 A.2d 827 (Conn. App. Ct. 1991)
Case details for

Friedman v. Demato

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL FRIEDMAN v. PETER DEMATO ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 14, 1991

Citations

591 A.2d 827 (Conn. App. Ct. 1991)
24 Conn. App. 830