From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedland v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

March, 1933.


Order modified by eliminating therefrom the following: "on condition that the defendant herein waive a trial by jury, otherwise motion denied," and as so modified affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Upon the facts in this case the defendant was entitled as a matter of right to have her default opened. Therefore, the court abused its discretion in imposing conditions, and particularly the condition that the defendant waive her right to have the issue of adultery tried by a jury. (See Glueck v. Tull, 192 App. Div. 81.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Friedland v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Friedland v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FRIEDLAND, Respondent, v. FANNY FRIEDLAND, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Selznick v. City of New York

Defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 17, 1971, as…