From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jun 28, 1979
592 P.2d 948 (Nev. 1979)

Opinion

No. 10408

April 6, 1979 Rehearing denied June 28, 1979

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Howard W. Babcock, Judge.

Stanley W. Pierce, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Frank A. King, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


Erna Frick was injured on the job on August 18, 1970. She earned $747.45 per month. The Commission declared her to be permanently and totally disabled on October 1, 1974, and has paid her permanent total disability benefits since that date.

NRS 616.625 fixes benefits as of the date of injury. On that date NRS 616.580 provided that in cases of permanent total disability, compensation shall be 65 percent of the average monthly wage and that any excess of wages over $320 per month shall not be taken into account in computing such compensation. The Commission has paid her $208.80 per month, that is, 65 percent of $320 per month, pursuant to NRS 616.580 as it existed on the date of injury. She receives an additional $41.60 per month under NRS 616.626.

Contrary to appellant's contention, the current version of NRS 616.580 does not apply. In the absence of a legislative intent to give an amendment retroactive effect, a compensation act increasing benefits is not retroactive. Virden v. Smith, 46 Nev. 208, 210 P. 129 (1922). There is no suggestion of retroactivity in the statute we are dealing with.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jun 28, 1979
592 P.2d 948 (Nev. 1979)
Case details for

Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:ERNA FRICK, APPELLANT, v. NEVADA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jun 28, 1979

Citations

592 P.2d 948 (Nev. 1979)
592 P.2d 948

Citing Cases

Prescott v. United States

The "vested rights" theory is a general rule of law to the effect that the law in force at the time of an…