From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freyre v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 1, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Pfizer, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.

After the defendant Pfizer, Inc., made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiff, in her opposing papers, failed to establish that Pfizer, Inc., the abutting landowner, "made the condition of the [sidewalk] more hazardous by plowing" ( Oley v. Village of Massapequa Park, 198 A.D.2d 272, 273; Herrick v. Grand Union Co., 1 A.D.2d 911; Kelly v. Rose, 291 N.Y. 611; Connolly v. Bursch, 149 App. Div. 772; Spicehandler v. City of New York, 303 N.Y. 946; Bricca v. New York Tel. Co., 37 A.D.2d 564). Accordingly, the motion of Pfizer, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it must be granted. Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Freyre v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Freyre v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SOCORRA FREYRE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and PFIZER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 655