From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freyja v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
Case No.: CV 14-7831 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Summary

finding no TCPA violation where the defendant sold business information it gathered during calls because the "regulation bans calls to sell property, goods, or services, not calls to acquire information"

Summary of this case from Schulz v. Infogroup, Inc.

Opinion

Case No.: CV 14-7831 DSF (MRWx)

10-19-2015

HOLLY FREYJA, Plaintiff, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

The Court having granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice, and that defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Dated: 10/19/15

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Freyja v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2015
Case No.: CV 14-7831 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

finding no TCPA violation where the defendant sold business information it gathered during calls because the "regulation bans calls to sell property, goods, or services, not calls to acquire information"

Summary of this case from Schulz v. Infogroup, Inc.
Case details for

Freyja v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOLLY FREYJA, Plaintiff, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

Case No.: CV 14-7831 DSF (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Citing Cases

Schulz v. Infogroup, Inc.

Thus, even if Infogroup's calls were made with the purpose of furthering a beneficial transaction beneficial…