Freyermuth v. Chon

2 Citing cases

  1. C S Trust v. Hicks

    216 Ga. App. 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 8 times

    The contract's arguable internal inconsistency as to the effect of O. C. Hubert's death, as opposed to his incapacity, precludes the grant of a directed verdict on the breach of contract claim. Freyermuth v. Chon, 212 Ga. App. 845, 846 ( 443 S.E.2d 636) (1994). 2.

  2. Miller v. Lynch

    351 Ga. App. 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 7 times
    Declining to address an issue under our right-for-any-reason rule before the trial court has done so

    There was evidence at trial, however slight, that Lynch was not negotiating with interested buyers in good faith, supporting Miller's claim for a breach of fiduciary duties. Freyermuth v. Chon , 212 Ga. App. 845, 846, 443 S.E.2d 636 (1994) (noting that in order to prevail on a motion for directed verdict, "there must be no evidence of any kind supporting [the opposing party's] position."); Auriga Capital Corp. , supra, 40 A.3d at 859 (IV) (B), 875 (IV) (B) (4) (a) (determining that manager of the LLC breached his fiduciary duties to the minority shareholders by "turning away a responsible bidder which could have paid a price beneficial to the LLC and its investors"). See also Gantler v. Stephens , 965 A.2d 695, 698 (Del. 2009) (reversing lower court's dismissal of lawsuit by minority shareholders against officers and directors for violating their fiduciary duties, at the bidding stage, by "rejecting a valuable opportunity to sell the [c]ompany").