From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frey v. Goldring

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 28, 2004
142 S.W.3d 779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82542.

June 15, 2004. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 10, 2004. Application for Transfer Denied September 28, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County; Lucy D. Rauch, Judge.

Michael Foss Merritt, Creve Coeur, MO, for appellant.

Jeana D. McFerron, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.


ORDER


Thomas Frey (Frey) appeals from a trial court judgment notwithstanding the verdict on his breach of contract claim against Joyce Goldring. Frey argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the alleged contract was invalid because it was missing an essential term, namely a fixed price or a method to ascertain the price. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that because Frey did not make a submissible case for breach of contract, the trial court did not err in entering a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Pikey v. Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am., 922 S.W.2d 777, 780 (Mo.App.E.D. 1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Frey v. Goldring

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 28, 2004
142 S.W.3d 779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Frey v. Goldring

Case Details

Full title:Thomas FREY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joyce GOLDRING, Defendant/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 28, 2004

Citations

142 S.W.3d 779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)