From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freund v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2015
NO. SACV 13-1122-AB (KLS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NO. SACV 13-1122-AB (KLS)

11-03-2015

ERIK JOHN FREUND, Petitioner, v. MARION SPEARMAN, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections To The Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novoreview of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. However, in adopting the Report, the Court amends page 2 of the Report And Recommendation to correctly reflect the length of Petitioner's sentence, which is a determinate term of 14 years, not, as stated in the Report, a term of "14 years to life."

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: November 3, 2015.

/s/_________

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Freund v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2015
NO. SACV 13-1122-AB (KLS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Freund v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:ERIK JOHN FREUND, Petitioner, v. MARION SPEARMAN, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

NO. SACV 13-1122-AB (KLS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2015)