From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fresno Unified Sch. Dist. v. K.U.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01699-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-01699-LJO-MJS

02-01-2013

FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. K.U. ET AL., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Sang-Jin Nam Melody A. Hawkins Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT F. Richard Ruderman Christian M. Knox Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants K.U. and A.D.U.


McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
Sang-Jin Nam, #148859
Melody A. Hawkins, #226522
5 River Park Place East
Fresno, California 93720-1501
Telephone: (559) 433-1300
Facsimile: (559) 433-2300
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

REGARDING EXTENDING TIME TO

MAKE RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES

AND ORDER THEREON


STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

1. Pursuant to Section VI.(A) of the Scheduling Order in the above captioned case, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Fresno Unified School District ("Plaintiff") and Defendants and Counterclaimants K.U. and A.D.U. ("Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants shall be collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") are to exchange their respective Initial Disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before January 31, 2013.

2. The Parties are currently working towards the settlement of this action and as such, by and through their counsel of record, have mutually agreed and stipulated that additional time is necessary to allow the parties to complete their respective Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures.

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(C), the Parties have agreed and hereby stipulate to extend the date for their respective Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosure to Friday, February 15, 2013.

4. As such, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, have agreed and stipulated to continue the date of their respective Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures from January 31, 2013 to February 15, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: ________________________

Sang-Jin Nam

Melody A. Hawkins

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

RUDERMAN & KNOX LLP

By: ________________________

F. Richard Ruderman

Christian M. Knox

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants

K.U. and A.D.U.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the parties' stipulation, above, is accepted and adopted as the Order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Fresno Unified Sch. Dist. v. K.U.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01699-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Fresno Unified Sch. Dist. v. K.U.

Case Details

Full title:FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. K.U. ET AL., Defendant. AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-01699-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)