From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freitag v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 30, 2014
443 S.W.3d 728 (E.D. Mo. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100272.

09-30-2014

Isaiah FREITAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isaiah Freitag appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).


Summaries of

Freitag v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 30, 2014
443 S.W.3d 728 (E.D. Mo. 2014)
Case details for

Freitag v. State

Case Details

Full title:Isaiah FREITAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

443 S.W.3d 728 (E.D. Mo. 2014)