Opinion
Civil Action 2:08-cv-944.
May 12, 2009
ORDER
On January 30, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13), recommending that this case be dismissed as against Defendant Ted Strickland (Doc. 20). Objections to this report and recommendation were due by February 17, 2009. Plaintiff requested, and received, an extension of time to object until March 30, 2009 (Doc. 23). However, he has not filed any objections.
Given Plaintiff's lack of objection to the report and recommendation, and on de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I find the report and recommendation well taken. Accordingly, it (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED as against Defendant Ted Strickland.