From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Iconix Brand Grp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 28, 2021
21 Civ. 5986 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 5986 (AT)

07-28-2021

ADAM FREEMAN. Plaintiff, v. ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC., ROBERT C. GALVIN, F. PETER CUNEO, JUSTIN BARNES, DREW COHEN, and JAMES MARCUM, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding, ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discoveiy through remote means at eveiy available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Iconix Brand Grp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 28, 2021
21 Civ. 5986 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Freeman v. Iconix Brand Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM FREEMAN. Plaintiff, v. ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC., ROBERT C. GALVIN, F…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 5986 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2021)