From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freegard v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 17, 2011
File No. 1:11-cv-12 -jgm (D. Vt. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

File No. 1:11-cv-12-jgm.

October 17, 2011


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed September 20, 2011. (Doc. 14.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Defendant's Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner (Doc. 12) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision (Doc. 9) is GRANTED in part. This case is remanded for reassessment of the evidence and further development of the record in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's request that the matter be remanded for a calculation of benefits is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont.


Summaries of

Freegard v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 17, 2011
File No. 1:11-cv-12 -jgm (D. Vt. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Freegard v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KITTY MARIE FREEGARD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

File No. 1:11-cv-12 -jgm (D. Vt. Oct. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Manning v. Astrue

Manning cites to this Court's decision in Freegard to support his argument, but that case is distinguishable.…

Johnston v. Colvin

Judge Fitzsimmons also acknowledged that the regulations and caselaw both advise that reports of medical…