Fred Meyer, Inc., v. Bundy

10 Citing cases

  1. Menasha Corporation v. Crawford

    332 Or. 404 (Or. 2001)   Cited 3 times

    In 1999, former ORS 656.268(3)(d) (1995), was renumbered as ORS 656.268(4)(d), but was otherwise unchanged. Shortly after the Board issued its Crawford decision, the Court of Appeals, in an en banc decision, reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385 (1999). In Bundy, the Court of Appeals described the issue as "whether ORS 656.262(4)(g) applies to only procedural obligations to pay temporary disability while a claim is open, or whether it also applies to the substantive entitlement to benefits at claim closure."

  2. Matter of Crawford

    164 Or. App. 174 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 1 times

    Appeal from Judicial review from Workers' Compensation Board, No. 98-03327. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385, rev allowed 329 Or. 318 (1999). Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

    991 P.2d 1058 (Or. 1999)   Cited 4 times

    On Appeal from the Court of Appeals. Judicial review from the Workers' Compensation Board. 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385 (1999). Roger Ousey, of Bischoff, Strooband Ousey, P.C., Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review Kenneth P. Bundy.

  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

    994 P.2d 122 (Or. 1999)

    PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED ( 159 Or. App. 44) Petition for review allowed.

  5. Morales v. Saif

    196 Or. App. 693 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 2 times

    ORS 656.268 applies to aggravation claims. See Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply, 336 Or 349, 372, 84 P3d 119 (2004); Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385, rev dismissed, 329 Or 503 (1999). When a worker is no longer totally disabled, ORS 656.212 provides authorization for a reduction in temporary disability benefits:

  6. In re Firestone

    18 P.3d 1106 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)

    PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385, rev dismissed 329 Or. 503 (1999).

  7. Matter of Sledd

    984 P.2d 952 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)

    The Board adopted and affirmed the administrative law judge's order, which was based on the Board's decision in an earlier case, Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996). However, this court has since reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385, rev pending (1999). We remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

  8. Matter of Hart

    984 P.2d 952 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)

    PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385 (1999).

  9. SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero

    987 P.2d 529 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)

    The Board relied on its decision in Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996), which we subsequently reversed. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385 (1999). Whether our decision in Bundy will affect the determination of claimant's entitlement to temporary disability compensation is not apparent from the record before us. Consequently, we remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

  10. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Holcomb

    978 P.2d 395 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)

    PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or. App. 44, 978 P.2d 385 (1999).