From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Ridley-Thomas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 14, 2022
2:20-cv-11676-CAS-SKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-11676-CAS-SKx

07-14-2022

DARRYELL FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS; ET AL.,Defendants.


ORDER RE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION IN ITS ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 41(A)(1)

HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SYNDER, DISTRICT.

The Court has reviewed and considered the Parties' Stipulation for Dismissal of Action in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(A)(1). The terms of the settlement have been carried out.

THEREFORE, the Court dismisses all claims by Plaintiff Darryell Fraizer against Defendants Mark Ridley-Thomas; Hilda Solis; Sheila Kuehl, Law Offices of The Los Angeles County Public Defender; County of Los Angeles; Ronald Brown; Kelly Emling; Laura Green, Michael Suzuki; Jenny Brown; Daniel Kuperberg;

Ruben Marquez (collectively, “Defendants”) in the above-captioned matter with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frazier v. Ridley-Thomas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 14, 2022
2:20-cv-11676-CAS-SKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Frazier v. Ridley-Thomas

Case Details

Full title:DARRYELL FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS; ET AL.,Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-11676-CAS-SKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)