From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Pike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 29, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01609-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-01609-APG-VCF

09-29-2017

BENJAMIN FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL PIKE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(ECF No. 3)

On September 6, 2017, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach entered a report and recommendation that I dismiss plaintiff Benjamin Frazier's complaint without prejudice. Frazier did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)). Nevertheless, Judge Ferenbach sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Ferenbach's report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is accepted. Plaintiff Benjamin Frazier's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Frazier v. Pike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 29, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01609-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Frazier v. Pike

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL PIKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 29, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-01609-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2017)