Fraser v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Full title: FRASER ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2015

2:13-cv-0520 TLN DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)

Opinion

FRASER ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-0520 TLN DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. February 20, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         On February 20, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendant's motion to compel. Attorney Paul Lindsay appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs and attorneys Lisa Kim and Scott Jacobs appeared on behalf of the defendant.

         Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Defendant's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 23) is granted;

         2. Both named plaintiff's deposition shall be limited to no more than four hours of questioning by counsel for defendant;

         3. Plaintiff Fraser's deposition shall take place in Irvine, California, or at any other place if mutually agreed to by the parties; and

         4. Plaintiffs' depositions shall be completed within sixty days of the date of this order, absent further order from the court.