From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franzese v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
17 CIVIL 3020 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 3020 (AJN)

11-30-2020

Edward Franzese, Plaintiff, v. City of New York, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 13, 2018, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. As Plaintiff was on notice that declining to amend his pleadings to timely respond to Defendants' first motion to dismiss may constitute a waiver of his right to use the amendment process to cure any defects that had been made apparent by Defendants' briefing, Dkt. No. 27, Plaintiffs claim is dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York

November 30, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Franzese v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
17 CIVIL 3020 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Franzese v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Edward Franzese, Plaintiff, v. City of New York, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

17 CIVIL 3020 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)