From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franko v. Lewnowski

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 22, 2021
21-CV-6115 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6115 (VSB)

09-22-2021

MICHAEL FRANKO, Plaintiff, - v. OSKAR LEWNOWSKI et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK

On September 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). (Doc. 15.) “[W]hen a plaintiff properly amends [a] complaint after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Natl Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Defendants shall file a letter on or before September 29, 2021 deciding whether their motion to dismiss should be deemed moot without prejudice to refile a new motion to dismiss in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), or if I should evaluate Defendants' current motion to dismiss in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.


Summaries of

Franko v. Lewnowski

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 22, 2021
21-CV-6115 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Franko v. Lewnowski

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FRANKO, Plaintiff, - v. OSKAR LEWNOWSKI et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6115 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2021)