From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-211 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-211 CRIM. NO. 2:08-CR-186(14)

04-23-2013

THOMAS L. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGE SARGUS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING


ORDER

On April 2, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that all of petitioner's claims be dismissed, except the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 1423. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no objection.

The .Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 1423, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Petitioner's claims are DISMISSED, except his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on his attorney's alleged failure to advise him that, should he plead guilty to the gun charge in Count 107, he would be ineligible for a "safety valve" reduction of his sentence on the drug charge in Count 2 to less than the mandatory minimum. As to this claim, counsel shall be appointed for petitioner and the matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for an evidentiary hearing.

________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Franklin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-211 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Franklin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-211 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 23, 2013)