From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 1, 1900
145 P. 1145 (Okla. Crim. App. 1900)

Opinion

No. A-1676.

Decided January 1, 1900.

Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge.

Al Franklin and Elmer Johnson were convicted of gaming, and appeal. Reversed as to Franklin and dismissed as to Johnson.

Reardon Hereford, for plaintiff in error.

C.J. Davenport, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Al Franklin and Elmer Johnson were convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of operating a gambling game, and their punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of six months, and a fine of one thousand dollars each. An appeal from the judgment was duly lodged in this court. Counsel for plaintiff in error have called the attention of the court to the fact that Johnson has been pardoned by the Governor. This appeal, as to Johnson is, therefore, dismissed. There is no evidence in the record which tends reasonably to establish the offense charged against Franklin. The evidence overwhelmingly indicates the guilt of the plaintiff in error Johnson. A demurrer to the evidence as to Franklin should have been sustained by the trial court. The judgment as to him is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant a new trial.


Summaries of

Franklin v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 1, 1900
145 P. 1145 (Okla. Crim. App. 1900)
Case details for

Franklin v. State

Case Details

Full title:AL FRANKLIN AND ELMER JOHNSON v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 1, 1900

Citations

145 P. 1145 (Okla. Crim. App. 1900)
11 Okla. Crim. 706