From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-2681 SECTION: "F" (4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-2681 SECTION: "F" (4)

10-22-2013

DEREK FRANKLIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


ORDER

The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of the plaintiff to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's final decision denying Plaintiff, Derek Franklin claim for Disability Benefits and Supplemental Social Security Income Benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1382(c), is AFFIRMED as its decision was based on substantial evidence, pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 22nd day of October, 2013

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Franklin v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-2681 SECTION: "F" (4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Franklin v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:DEREK FRANKLIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-2681 SECTION: "F" (4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Evidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence, particularly evidence offered by…

Walker v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Evidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence, particularly evidence offered by…