From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 26, 2017
2:15-cv-01727-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2017)

Opinion

2:15-cv-01727-JCM-GWF

01-26-2017

TERON FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On August 2, 2016, this court dismissed the case with prejudice pursuant to a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice filed by the parties. (ECF No. 12). On October 24, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a motion for protective order. (ECF Nos. 13, 14). The motions, which are identical, allege that plaintiff needs help because unnamed individuals are poisoning him and the court should call his mom. (Id.)

The court denies the motions because this is a closed case. If plaintiff seeks to pursue a new lawsuit with these allegations, he may do so by filing a new civil rights complaint and a new application to proceed in forma pauperis with the court.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motions for preliminary injunction and protective order (ECF Nos. 13, 14) are DENIED.

DATED: January 26, 2017

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 26, 2017
2:15-cv-01727-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Franklin v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:TERON FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 26, 2017

Citations

2:15-cv-01727-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2017)