From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Lucero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 15, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-1239-MV-JHR (D.N.M. Nov. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1:18-cv-1239-MV-JHR

11-15-2019

BRYCE FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. ALISHA LUCERO, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

The Magistrate Judge filed his Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on October 17, 2019. [Doc. 14]. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen (14) days and that failure to do so waived appellate review. To date, the parties have not filed any objections and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Petition Under 28 U .S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. 1] is DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED;

3. The Request for Hearing [Doc. 14] is DENIED; and

4. The Motion for Respondents to Provide a Copy of D.N.M.L.R. [Doc. 11] is DENIED as moot.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Franklin v. Lucero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 15, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-1239-MV-JHR (D.N.M. Nov. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Franklin v. Lucero

Case Details

Full title:BRYCE FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. ALISHA LUCERO, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Nov 15, 2019

Citations

No. 1:18-cv-1239-MV-JHR (D.N.M. Nov. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

Rhodes v. Sterling

]"); Wiggins v. Sisco , No. 17-3080, 2018 WL 1035161, at *1 (D. Kan. Feb. 23, 2018) ("If Mr. Wiggins did not…

Franklin v. Santistevan

In evaluating his habeas petition, Judge Ritter observed, and Judge Vazquez agreed, that the step-regression…