From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. CA Corr. Health Care Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:21-cv-03244-SVW-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-03244-SVW-JPR

10-13-2022

Title Breanna Franklin v. CA Correctional Health Care Services


Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER

Plaintiff was advised that future inadequate showings of her damages would result in the case being dismissed. Plaintiff has, again, failed to make an adequate showing. Though the materials provided show that she wrote to the EEOC, there is no evidence showing the EEOC's response regarding a right to sue. More saliently, evidence of medical bills, absent the requested evidence showing mitigation of damages and the number of employees engaged by the defendant, are inadequate to establish the requested damages, as we discussed in prior orders. See PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Crescent Fin. & Ins. Agency, Inc., 2017 WL 4342050, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2017) (denying a motion for default judgment where plaintiff provided insufficient evidence and thus failed to meet the burden required to establish damages). Therefore, the motion for default judgment is denied, and the case is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Franklin v. CA Corr. Health Care Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:21-cv-03244-SVW-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Franklin v. CA Corr. Health Care Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Title Breanna Franklin v. CA Correctional Health Care Services

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-03244-SVW-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)