From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 10, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-00488 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-00488.

June 10, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's April 27, 2010 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Mark Franklin is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 10, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-00488 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Franklin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Mark Franklin, Plaintiff v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 10, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-00488 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Dotson v. Twin Valley Behavioral Healthcare

See http//: www.mentalhealth.ohio.gov." Franklin v. Astrue, 2010 WL 2667388, *2 n.2 (S.D. Ohio June 10,…