From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Coe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1976
51 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

March 8, 1976


In an action to recover damages for abuse of process, plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 28, 1975, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and (2) a decision of the same court, dated July 25, 1975, upon which the order was made. Appeal from the decision dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a decision. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. "`The gist of the action for abuse of process lies in the improper use of process after it is issued'" (Hauser v Bartow, 273 N.Y. 370, 373). Plaintiffs are in effect complaining of the institution of an action against them and not of any wrong committed in the execution of process during the course of that suit (see Miller v Stern, 262 App. Div. 5, 8). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Damiani, Christ and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frank v. Coe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1976
51 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Frank v. Coe

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS J. FRANK et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT I. COE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Drago v. Buonagurio

The court first finds that the complaint does not state a cause of action for abuse of process. The gist of…

Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.

civil action by service of a summons and complaint does not satisfy the requirement that there be regularly…