From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank H. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 17, 2022
C. A. 1:21-888-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

C. A. 1:21-888-SVH

03-17-2022

Frank H., [1] Plaintiff, v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”). [ECF No. 22]. On January 10, 2022, the court issued an order granting the Commissioner's motion to remand, reversing the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remanding the action for further administrative proceedings. [ECF No. 20]. On March 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed this motion seeking $8,351.09 in attorney fees and $402 in costs. [ECF No. 22]. The Commissioner subsequently filed the parties' stipulation to $7,500 in attorney fees and $402 in costs. [ECF No. 23]. Given the parties' agreement and Plaintiff's attorney's representations in his motion and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), the court grants the motion and directs the Commissioner to pay Plaintiff $7,902. This payment shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any further claims that Plaintiff may have under the EAJA to fees, costs, and expenses incurred in connection with disputing the Commissioner's decision. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs counsel to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.

Plaintiff requests reimbursement of the court's filing fee. [ECF No. 22 at 1].

Attorney fees of $7,500 shall be paid out of agency funds and costs of $402 shall be paid out of the Judgment Fund by the Department of the Treasury.

Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595-97 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this court belong to Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Therefore, the court orders the EAJA fee be paid to Plaintiff through payment delivered to Plaintiffs counsel.

Plaintiffs counsel may disburse these funds to satisfy valid liens or in accordance with a lawful assignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frank H. v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 17, 2022
C. A. 1:21-888-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Frank H. v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:Frank H., [1] Plaintiff, v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

C. A. 1:21-888-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 2022)