From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-37.

March 30, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott Silvermen, Judge.

Kenneth P. Speiller, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Annette Lizardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the allegation that the appellant was not advised of the immigration consequences of her plea was clearly refuted by the record. Nonomme v. State, 834 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Further, the trial court's summary denial was proper where the trial court attached the transcript of the plea colloquy and the rights waiver form to the order denying relief. See Oliver v. State, 691 So.2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Franco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Franco v. State

Case Details

Full title:Irma FRANCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 30, 2005

Citations

897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)