From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco-Pou v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jan 30, 2012
No. 3:11cv1859 (SRU) (D. Conn. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11cv1859 (SRU)

01-30-2012

JOSE A. FRANCO-POU, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Jose Franco-Pou pled guilty on October 13, 2004 to a charge of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine. Judgment entered against Franco-Pou on March 7, 2005. Franco-Pou filed a notice of appeal on March 9, 2005, but withdrew his appeal on June 13, 2005. On November 21, 2011, Franco-Pou filed a letter motion requesting the sentencing transcripts and plea agreements of his co-defendants so that he could prepare a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Any potential motion pursuant to section 2255, however, appears untimely. As such, Franco-Pou's letter motion [doc. # 1] is DENIED without prejudice. Franco-Pou may resubmit his request only upon a showing of good cause for tolling the statute of limitations for bringing a petition pursuant to section 2255. Franco-Pou shall submit any renewed request within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order.

It is so ordered.

Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 30 day of January 2012.

_________________________

Stefan R. Underhill

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Franco-Pou v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jan 30, 2012
No. 3:11cv1859 (SRU) (D. Conn. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Franco-Pou v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. FRANCO-POU, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11cv1859 (SRU) (D. Conn. Jan. 30, 2012)

Citing Cases

Franco-Pou v. United States

Because a petition under section 2255 would have been untimely, I denied that motion without prejudice,…

Franco-Pou v. United States

Petitioner's first federal habeas petition was denied on the merits. See Franco-Pou v. USA, 3:11cv1859(SRU)…