Opinion
May Term, 1896.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. The court is not unanimous in questions of fact involved in the case. No opinion. All concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Francisco v. Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1896
5 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Summaries of
Francisco v. Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1896
5 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for
Francisco v. Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:William Francisco, Respondent, v. The Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1896
Citations
5 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)