From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Van Middlesworth

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 23, 1953
116 N.E.2d 419 (Ohio 1953)

Opinion

No. 33772

Decided December 23, 1953.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Real property — Forfeiture sale for nonpayment of taxes — County auditor's duty to publish, sufficiently performed, when — List contains owner's name as found on tax duplicate — Statute of limitations — Action challenging purchaser's title barred in one year — Section 5762-1, General Code — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.

Messrs. Cowan Adams, for appellant.

mr. Walter R. Snider, for appellee.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Francis v. Van Middlesworth

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 23, 1953
116 N.E.2d 419 (Ohio 1953)
Case details for

Francis v. Van Middlesworth

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS, APPELLANT v. VAN MIDDLESWORTH, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 23, 1953

Citations

116 N.E.2d 419 (Ohio 1953)
116 N.E.2d 419

Citing Cases

Howard v. Realty Co.

Gwynne v. Niswanger, 15 Ohio 367, was followed in Ray v. Jones, 57 Ohio Law Abs. 426. The headnote in Francis…