From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frame v. Humility of Mary Health

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 12, 2009
CASE NO. 4: 08 CV 1712 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 12, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4: 08 CV 1712.

June 12, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (ECF # 17). The Report and Recommendation, filed on May 27, 2009, is ADOPTED by this Court (ECF # 17), and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (ECF # 8).

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Baughman for general pretrial supervision, including the preparation of a report and recommendation on dispositive motions (ECF # 7). On May 27, 2009, Magistrate Judge Baughman recommended that this Court grant Defendants' Motion. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court finds Magistrate Judge Baughman's Report and Recommendation to be well-written, well-supported, and correct. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety (ECF # 17), and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (ECF # 8). This case is TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frame v. Humility of Mary Health

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 12, 2009
CASE NO. 4: 08 CV 1712 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Frame v. Humility of Mary Health

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY FRAME, Plaintiff, v. HUMILITY OF MARY HEALTH, PARTNERS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 12, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 4: 08 CV 1712 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Med. Quant USA, Inc. v. Karns

This Court has held that when the state law is not novel or difficult, but a more routine matter of…