From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foxmind Canada Enters. v. Abctec

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 23, 2021
21 Civ. 5146 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 5146 (KPF)

07-23-2021

FOXMIND CANADA ENTERPRISES LTD, Plaintiff, v. ABCTEC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:

For substantially the same reasons outlined in Plaintiff's letter regarding Defendant Kulala US's motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order (Dkt. #8), as well as the cases cited therein, this Court finds that the entity Kulala U.S. cannot be represented by its non-attorney proprietor, Zhanghongchi, in this action. The Court's conclusion is supported by the representations made in the Declaration of Zhanghongchi, which is appended to Defendant's motion. (See Dkt. #5 at 24-26). In particular, the Declaration ascribes the operations of the online sales business to the entity Kulala US, explaining that “[o]ne of the items Kulala sold was the [at-issue product], ” that “Kulala had an account on Amazon, ” and that the Amazon account contained “revenue from sales of all products sold by Kulala US.” (Id. at 24 (emphasis in original)). On this characterization, Kulala U.S. is a business entity that is distinct from the individual who purports to own and operate it. (See also id. (“I am a sole proprietor operating the Amazon store Kulala U.S. identified on Attachment ‘A' to the Complaint, a Real Party in Interest in this action and am authorized to execute this declaration on its behalf.” (emphasis added)))

The Court is mindful of the hardship that the obligation to retain counsel may present. So that Defendant Kulala U.S. has ample time to retain counsel, the Court will provide until August 23, 2021, for Defendant to do so.

This Order does not speak to whether Defendant Kulala U.S. is entitled to the relief sought by the prospective pro se representative in the Combined Motion to Dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order. (Dkt. #5). Rather, the Court has only determined that Defendant Kulala U.S. must be represented by counsel to properly request such relief.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 5. Plaintiff is directed to serve this Order on Defendant Kulala U.S. and movant Zhanghongchi using any previously-used modes of transmission.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Foxmind Canada Enters. v. Abctec

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 23, 2021
21 Civ. 5146 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Foxmind Canada Enters. v. Abctec

Case Details

Full title:FOXMIND CANADA ENTERPRISES LTD, Plaintiff, v. ABCTEC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 5146 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2021)