From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the infant plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in skating on an outdoor ice skating rink where he sustained his injuries, including those risks associated with any open and obvious conditions of the ice surface ( see, Giaimo v. Roller Derby Skate Corp., 234 A.D.2d 340; Cardoza v. Village of Freeport, 205 A.D.2d 571; Byrne v. Westchester County, 178 A.D.2d 575).

Mangano, P.J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fox v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Fox v. Town of Oyster Bay

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD FOX et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 871

Citing Cases

Josefs v. State

While he was not specifically asked, nor did he state, whether he was aware of the hole into which he…

Geffen v. City of New York

However, the plaintiff's own testimony reveals that she knew that the skates were loose and ill-fitting, but…